Category: Congregation

  • At the New System Dinner Table, Part 2: Tales of Forgiveness

    (Part 1 here)

    Okay, TrueTom, it’s your turn at the New System dinner table. Did you make peace with anyone that later saved you from strangling her in prison? Anyone that can put up with you—that’s saying a lot. Come on, spill.”

    ”Yes, brothers, I had such a trial. I had almost lost my peace with a certain sister. I had used the D-word online, as in “You would think that the same d**n button that puts you in private mode would take you out again, but nooo!” —and she was offended by it.”

    No!

    ”Yavolle. Your English is no good, she said. That clearly indicates that you are pagan. Whereas others are instructed in the proper use of English, you are clearly not. And although you speak of God’s name on the several diverse social media forums, I can tell that you are really not for him!” (sung to the My Fair Lady tune of You Did It)

    ”Whoa! That really must have been a test for you, Truetom. What did you do?”

    ”I told her about when an elder backed into my car when it was parked in the turnaround spot where he did not expect it to be and said ‘Sh*t!’ He apologized and I said, ‘Don’t worry about it. That’s what bumpers are for.”

    And I also thanked her for for contacting me to apologize for calling me out in front of other digital people, said an apology was not necessary, and that I could stand a rebuke now and then, that it did me good.

    That certainly is an upbuilding experience, TrueTom. Thank you for sharing. But now it’s time for our nightly serenade in the courtyard. Tonight, we will be singing the tune ‘Jailhouse Rock.’ Who knows?—maybe a guard will be listening. That verse in Acts about Paul and Silas shows they do that sometimes.

    (The guard did afterward make the observation that, ‘Even though you were prisoners, you were ‘truly free.’ This may be an allusion to Emily Baran’s book, an allusion I also picked up in ‘I Don’t Know Why We Persecute Jehovah’s Witnesses’ of a Russian guard observing Witnesses singing in the gulag, who remarked, “Truly only someone who has internal freedom can become a Jehovah’s Witness.”)

    28DB5D48-3E43-4A51-81FA-8985824A6939

    To be continued here

    ******  The bookstore

     

  • Little Enemies of God

    What Lett said was:

    “Now, if we think about it, we’re not born as friends of God because we’re born as sinful offspring of Adam. Actually, when we think about it, we’re born as enemies of God. Sometimes you’ll hear people say of a little baby, ‘Look at that little angel,’ but more accurate would be to say, ‘Look at that little enemy of God.’ Now, of course we love that little baby and it’s now not hopeless because our loving creator has made reconciliation with him within the reach of everyone. We can become a good friend of God and that close relationship with Jehovah will become our most valuable possession.”

    With the reference to Adam in Genesis, the place to focus is here:

    “For if when we were enemies we became reconciled to God through the death of his Son” (Romans 5:10) That happens by exercising faith in that death and what it signifies. Can a baby do that? Or must it be provisionally saved, as though grandfathered in, by means of its parents’ faith?

    He’s Lett. He’s not artful. But he is technically correct.

    For a guy who will quote Job 12:11, “Does not the ear test out words As the tongue tastes food?” you’d almost think he’d test them out a little more before letting loose with a phrase that every cherry picker will use to “distort the right ways of Jehovah.” But he is technically correct.

     


    *****Vic Vomodog, with whom I used to pull shoulder to shoulder in the work! —just like a couple of oxen, was busy as an ox throughout the Pursue Peace Regional Convention, taking detailed notes! Afterwards, he threw at me:

    “I know you wouldn’t dare comment on what GB Stephen Lett said during your convention,” before quoting Lett’s, “You hear people say of a little baby, ‘look at that little angel’, but more accurate would be to say, ‘look at that little enemy of God’”

    You don’t think so, do you?

    “Then Tom Harley, also called Tom Sheepandgoats, becoming fed up, looked at him intently  and said: “O man full of every sort of fraud and every sort of villainy, you son of the Devil, you enemy of everything righteous, will you not quit distorting the right ways of Jehovah?  (Acts 13:9-10)

    What Lett said was: 

    “Now, if we think about it, we're not born as friends of God because we're born as sinful offspring of Adam. Actually, when we think about it, we're born as enemies of God. Sometimes you'll hear people say of a little baby, ‘Look at that little angel,’ but more accurate would be to say, ‘Look at that little enemy of God.’ Now, of course we love that little baby and it's now not hopeless because our loving creator has made reconciliation with him within the reach of everyone. We can become a good friend of God and that close relationship with Jehovah will become our most valuable possession.”

    Notice how he twice said, ‘when we think about it?’ You have to do that—think about things. You don’t just parrot sound bites to make people you don’t like look bad. O, you spiteful fellow, who quotes scripture by the bushel basket but never lays hold on the one that applies, besides the reference to Adam in Genesis, the place to focus is here:

    “…through one man sin entered into the world and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because they had all sinned—.” Romans 5:12

    when we were enemies we became reconciled to God through the death of his Son,” by exercising faith in him, which a baby cannot yet do, and thus is temporarily ‘grandfathered’ via the faith of it’s parents. (vs 10)

    Now, as for Bro Lett, for a guy who will quote Job 12:11, “Does not the ear test out words As the tongue tastes food?” you’d almost think he’d test them out a little more before letting loose with a phrase that every evil cherry picker will use to “distort the right ways of Jehovah.”

    But I hate to think what Vomodog would have done to Jesus for his, ‘Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has everlasting life, and I will resurrect him on the last day; for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink.’ John 6:54-55

    Vomodog taunted, “Please tell me if he is truly adhering to and following Christ as a model.”

    Taking into consideration that passage in John, I would say Lett is supremely adhering to and following Christ as a model, in fact, more so than any of the other HQ staff.

    Imagine: what sort of vile person would comb through a convention in which every talk explores the theme verse (Psalm 34:14) ‘Seek peace and pursue it’ to find and exploit a faux pas?

    223E2A01-5736-431A-9334-BBFBA35A0A40

    Gif: Crying baby gifs/ tenor

    It may be just an example of God ‘laughing at the wisdom of this systems’s wise ones,’ proof that his anointed are, as in the first century, seldom of ‘noble birth,’ nor ‘wise,’ but decidedly ‘uneducated and ordinary.’

    I’ll take substance over style any day. Turn on the TV and you can see endless people whose ‘style’ is impeccable. Among them are some of the stupidest people whom God ever let roam the earth.

     

    ******  The bookstore

  • How Many Are the Cows?

    Our chum watched the video of Olivia being mocked by classmates. It would never happen that way, she said.  Why not? we asked. Things aren’t that bad?

    They wouldn’t ridicule her like that. They’d beat her up in the bathroom instead, she said.

    I do remember being guest at the home of some friends where the daughter matter-of-factly spoke of how at the school she used to attend girls would attack each other with box-cutters. They liked to sneak up on unsuspecting ones, preferring to disfigure the face.

    We had no idea.

    Not to say this would happen everywhere.. I think it would not. We once lived where there was a gritty school system. Long ago, I wrote of how the departing school superintendent was interviewed by local media about his tenure. This fellow was hailed as a superstar when he arrived, one sure to raise the sinking ship. He left in short order for greener pastures.

    He answered his interviewer with a bewildering set of buzzwords. Not to fear, I wrote. The skilled interpreter of ‘Educatese’ has no difficulty comprehending the underlying message: Don’t expect any changes in your lifetime.

    It was prophetic. Here we are decades later and there have been no changes. Well—that’s not technically correct. Things have gotten worse.  The SEC recently launched an investigation into that District’s internal finances. How often does THAT happen? And the education of the kids? Sigh…Fuhgeddaboudit.

    We didn’t want to leave the area at the time, even though we have since. We figured we’d homeschool the kids. No regrets, though it does put you out of sync with the agencies. Even before school, we went through all the Glenn Doman number cards with our babies, I am convinced to good effect—and even in the event it was not it was fun and took almost no time.

    At one point, following a Doman cue, we asked our infant to pick up the placard that was 57, as opposed to 56 and 58, dots all mixed up with no underlying pattern—the number written on the back so you would know. Instantly he did. But Doman said you can’t do it twice; infants get bored and they will not do it for show. Sure enough, when we tried again, he would not.

    Coincidence? Dunno. It was a one out of three chance, after all, so coincidence is certainly possible.  But he reached for it instantly, with no hesitation at all.

    The point was, in building your baby’s ‘better’ brain (Yikes!—Building Back Better) A8BD1D53-6D86-4E70-B1E7-194A94FA9B1Ethat if you see 3 or 4 cows in the field you instantly read them for their true number, but at some point you must start counting, 1…2…3…4…5…. The idea with the flash cards for an infant’s rapidly expanding brain was that you could push way up that point at which you had to start counting; that it could take in 56 at a glance. Doman’s flash cards went up to 100. 

    Davey-the-Kid went after that system with an almost missionary zeal that embarrassed him later. He was there, all right, at that pricey weeklong seminar in Philly (where I wan’t). ‘How’s field service?’ Ernie asked him over the phone but he replied he hadn’t gone out in service. “How’s the meetings?” Ernie asked but he replied he hadn’t been to any. “Did you pray?” Ernie said in mock exasperation.

    We’re talking about the guy who installed a 3 foot swimming pool in his heated basement so he could teach his baby to swim, another thing that was all the rage. Davey passed away some years ago, but his son is still with us. Come to think of it, if you asked me whether or not the kid can swim, I’d draw a blank.

     

    ******  The bookstore

  • Things that Drive You Crazy About the Faith—and How to View Them: Part 4

    This is  a multi-part series. For best results, start here.

    In general it is as 1 Corinthians 1:14-15 puts it: “A physical man does not accept the things of the spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot get to know them, because they are examined spiritually. However, the spiritual man examines all things, but he himself is not examined by any man.” The spiritual man has a greater grasp than the physical man.

    But that doesn’t mean that the physical man has no grasp at all.
    Most of the aggravating disconnects that arise in the Witness world stem from a reliance on ‘knowledge by revelation’ for the short term picture as well as the long. That reliance conveys certain advantages but also disadvantages. Whoever has followed this reasoning up to here—will they find this conclusion as comforting as I do? It means that 100 annoyances are actually just one. And that one, while it can be bamboozling, is not a dealbreaker. It is simply a way of looking at the world. It overall compares favorably with other ways of looking at the world, and where it does not, one can see why and adjust.

    earth globe with googly eyes on gray background

    I tiptoed around this way of looking at the world in ‘I Don’t Know Why We Persecute Jehovah’s Witnesses—Searching for the Why,’ not at that time fully appreciating just what it was that I was tiptoeing around. I attributed all to staying “no part of the world,” which is a factor but it is not the decisive factor. The decisive factor is ‘knowledge through revelation’—weighing in on almost any situation based upon what can be gleaned from the Bible.

    “If [the Governing Body] ever misrepresents the non-Witness world . . . it is because they do not know it intimately themselves. They take their own counsel with regard to association. They have lived their own lives with the lesson of Haggai ever foremost: ‘clean will be contaminated by unclean’, not the reverse, and so they do not go there. Because they do not go there, they know certain things only through the lens of Scripture.

    “If the Bible says, in effect, that the “world will chew you up and spit you out,” they assume that it does. If they find someone who says it in exactly those words, they eat it right up and broadcast it. And who is to say the words are untrue? Some get chewed up and spit out so promptly and decisively that no one would ever deny it, but with others? Who is to say the scriptures are wrong on that point? It may just take a longer time to get chewed up and spit out. Many seniors have encountered calamity, even contrived calamity, and have seen everything they had worked for drained away at their end. Even the powerful are not immune as their strength and faculties wane.

    “The Governing Body chugs along, deferring to what the Scriptures say. They go wherever the Bible indicates to them that they should go. If it gets them in a jam with some component of the present world, they are content that God will somehow get them out of it. They are like the leaders of the first century who were loath to abandon teaching of the word so as to wait on tables. That’s what helpers are for. Should they shoot themselves in the foot, as low-key as possible they extract the bullet with a grimace at their own mistake, and carry on. They will refine and shift and ultimately something will come down through congregation channels and this writer will say, “Yep, it must work, or there would not be the 1,000 languages [standing for the success of their efforts to get the uncontaminated gospel message out there, 1,000 languages far exceeding what even the most innovative tech or media company has come up with].”

    To be continued: here.

    ******  The bookstore

  • Things That Drive You Crazy about the Faith—and How to View Them: Part 3

    This will be a multi-part series. For best results, start here.

    A second indication that the Witnesses are not unduly hobbled by the mindset of ‘knowing things by revelation’ is that they don’t do ‘personal revelation.’ Many religions do. Witnesses rely upon a received text. The trouble with receiving your truth through personal revelation, and  then attempting to read it into a text where it is not explicitly stated, is that you eventually run into someone who has also received their truth through personal revelation, only the two revelations don’t match. How in the world are you ever going to reconcile them? Jehovah’s Witnesses avoid that problem. Early on they developed a method of letting the Bible interpret itself. On a given question, look up all scriptures with any bearing on the subject, then seek to reconcile them. It works, whereas myriad personal revelation tends to produce a hodgepodge of confusion.

    The third qualifier is that knowing things by revelation is exactly what you want when it comes to the big picture. It doesn’t hobble you at all. It liberates you and it is why people become Witnesses in the first place. “Here is a curious thing.” Vermont Royster writes after reviewing the material progress of his 1960s day. “In the contemplation of man himself, of his dilemmas, of his place in the universe, we are little further along than when time began. We are still left with questions of who we are and why we are and where we are going.” Not all will care about those questions, contenting themselves with technology instead. But those who do know it will come from revelation. In the case of Jehovah’s Witnesses, that revelation is the Bible.

    The problem arises when you rely on ‘knowledge by revelation’ not just for the big picture but also the small one. Do Jehovah’s Witnesses do that? If so, it is not so debilitating as it might first appear. The greater world, shunning knowledge through revelation for knowledge through observations and experimentation, Bacon’s kind of knowledge, comes to little resolution with the knowledge it collects. In 2018, the survey organization Pew Research reported that not only do most Americans not agree on answers to policy questions, but they also don’t agree on what the questions are. The majority of grown people are like sports fans. They cheer when their side scores and press their advantage. They wince when the other side scores and spin into damage control. But on no account do they examine the merits of the other side. They congeal at opposite poles and from those positions hurl abuse at each other on the internet
    —be it regarding human politics, public policy, health concerns, philosophical leanings, or whatever else is contemporary controversy. One advantage to the Witness who closely follows current events is to see this trait of people and thereby not become unduly concerned should the tide of criticism turn against them. It’s just the way people are. Read social media, see them hurling barbs at each other, and you can better endure when they do it at you.

    monochrome photo of man wearing jacket pointing finger at stadium
    Photo by Andrzej Mucka on Pexels.com

    If ‘knowledge through revelation’ has applied to the small picture has a downside, one can conclude from the foregoing paragraph that it also has an upside. When critics leaned on one Witness, that his people ought to involve themselves more in public controversies, he said, “Why should we? We have solved most of the problems that you are yet grappling with. Why should we trade the superior for the inferior?” Instead, Witnesses proclaim what works for them to a world that accepts or rejects it. Most do the latter. In which case, why weigh in? Jehovah’s Witnesses have no idea how to fix the problems of a world that discards the instruction manual. If there is a downside to knowledge by revelation, it is outweighed by the upside.

    To be continued: here.

    ******  The bookstore

  • Things That Drive You Crazy About the Faith—and How to View Them: 2nd Preface

    This will be a multi-part series. See Preface 

    On all the important questions topics Jehovah’s Witnesses are spot on. In these present days, when atheists are perfectly content with a few decades of life followed by eternal non-existence, even holding fast to God is a significant win. But besides holding to God, they get it straight on who he is. They carted off that trinity doctrine that paints him unknowable 100 years ago, about the same time they discarded the hellfire doctrine that paints him cruel, someone you would not want to know. Within his lifetime people called C.T. Russell “the man who turned the hose on hell and put out the fire.”

    firefighter using a fire hose
    Photo by Benjamin Farren on Pexels.com

    Not to mention how they explain why God permits evil and suffering, and tell what he’s going to do about it. They preach the good news of the kingdom. They tell about the resurrection. They heed what God says on how to live, and to the extent they do, their “peace is just like a river.” And their “righteousness?” Tell me about it. (Isaiah 48:18) Like the circuit overseer said, we are all “one big, happy, united, somewhat dysfunctional family.” All is bliss.

    And yet—and yet—there are a hundred aggravations. Basking in the big picture, you won’t notice them at first. But in time, they can be like that pebble in your shoe, driving you nuts with every step.

    What is it with these aggravations? Some are because Witnesses hang out closely even with those with whom they don’t mesh. They don’t take the easy way out and put distance between themselves like Lot and Abraham. Some are because, should a respected Witnesses do dirt, it can seriously stumble a person because the congregation is the one place he/she didn’t expect to find any.

    Yes! That’s the answer. Surely that accounts for it. Just smother your plate with agape love and you’re home free! And yet—and yet—there is one indefinable something . . . There is one—how can we define it? We can’t—it’s indefinable, unless, unless . . . what is it that’s so hard to put a finger on? I thunk and thunk and thunk about it and finally came up with the answer. Not me, really, but the Great Courses professors—college professors, every one of them. And I didn’t have to go to college to hear them. I found them free in the library and listen to them an hour each day walking the dog—which unfortunately died not long ago, but he lived to a ripe old dog age of 14, so I’m grateful for the time my wife and I had with him.

    Six times the Great Courses professor (Alan Charles Kors) spoke about “ideas which had stood the test of time.” It took every one of those times for the words to sink in. It wasn’t just my obtuseness. The concept is hard to get your head around. But once you do, all is a breeze, like when you learned to ride a bike.

    To be continued: here.

    ******  The bookstore

  • Things That Drive You Crazy About the Faith—and How to View Them: Preface

    Great scriptures and reasoning to someone who is anti witness,” she told me. “I did write up some things and then I thought….oh blow it…I’ll back him up…all the way!!!”

    Make no mistake. It is a concious choice. I could easily attach a “But what about such and such…” addendum to some paragraph in nearly every Watchtower if I wanted to. Some nettlesome point will stick in my craw, but then I will ask myself, ‘should I obsess over it?’ Wouldn’t that be like the pundit who reads that North Korea has launched all its nuclear missills?  People with sense will run for the hills. He runs to his keyboard to point out that the idiot can’t even spell the word right. Isn’t that called ‘losing sight of the big picture?’ Why would anyone want to do that? 

    rocket launch space discovery
    Photo by SpaceX on Pexels.com

    Jehovah’s Witnesses have it right in all the important things, but there’s a lot of minor aggravations. What to make of these? Is it because Witnesses all jammed together in close proximity whereas, in the greater world you just put distance between those with whom who don’t readily mesh? Partly. I’ve heard two circuit overseers describe us in the past few years as “one large, united, happy, somewhat dysfunctional family,” a phrase I suspect is not in any outline.

    Too, I’ve heard tell from young ones who’ve flown the coop that they don’t miss the “drama.” Yes, just pulling the Abraham/Lot stunt goes a long way towards alleviating tension: “So Abram said to Lot: ‘Please, there should be no quarreling between me and you …  separate from me. If you go to the left, then I will go to the right; but if you go to the right, then I will go to the left.’” (Genesis 13: 8-9) Witnesses don’t do that. They stick together and, with mixed success, try to apply Bible counsel to lessen “drama.’

    But if scrunching up is hard on us, what is to be said of the world in general? That’s why I gave my nemesis Vic Vomodog the answer I did when he tried to undermine 2 Timothy 3:1-5. “Humanity is no better or worse than in past centuries,” said he. “The scenography has changed and other global changes have taken place, but the nature of man is constant.”

    “It hardly matters, does it?” I told him. “You can fart all you want and as along as there is plenty of space between you and your neighbor, there are no real consequences. But when population, technology, and competition for resources brings people shoulder to shoulder, your unpleasant ways provoke strong reaction.” We’re cramped and it’s inconvenient. They’re cramped and it brings chaos to entire planet.

    But if you’re just one person, you can sort of just live in your own bubble and ignore all that, at least most times you can ignore it, at least you can until you can’t.

    These days I’m like Richard Kimble replying to Sam Gerard. “That’s right—I’m not trying to solve puzzles here,” Sam says. Richard replies that he is “and I just found a big piece.” Same here. I knew those Great Courses lectures would do more than prepare me to hold my own should that obnoxious know-it-all Alan F ever show his nasty persona here again. He was getting seriously up there in years and it could be he has died, but I think not because the birds in heaven have not all broken out in song. When he does die no doubt his headstone will call the cemetery caretaker an ignoramus for supposing the surrounding flowers and trees were made by God

    Those Great Courses lectures produced something valuable in their own right. And totally unanticipated. No way did I see it coming. And helpful? Tell me about it. More helpful than even the brother who had the odd mannerism of ending sentences with, ‘It’s helpful to know that, don’t you think?’ I mean, he was a wonderful brother, he really was, I went to visit him when he was ill, but that mannerism wore. One time he announced the date of the upcoming circuit assembly, adding, ‘It’s helpful to know that, don’t you think?’ I had to admit that it was.

    What I found through the Great Courses professors is even more helpful. It will better enable me to weather all the minor aggravations of the earthly organization, because they all boil down to the same thing. And that same thing, while it can be trying, is anything but a dealbreaker.

    To be continued: here

    ******  The bookstore

     

  • The First Physical Meeting in Two Years

    I wasn’t sure how I would feel about returning to the Hall. I’m starting to get up there in years. Zoom is convenient. You don’t have to travel. You don’t have to worry about the attire of your lower half. 

    But no sooner did I walk through the door than I knew it was the right move. Our attendance was very solid and enthusiasm ran high. The hybrid Zoom tie-in was seamless. 

    The speaker read that familiar passage of 2 Timothy 3:1-5. Though he did not dwell on “not open to any agreement,” it resonated with me. There is scarcely any point today, no matter how trivial, that people to not debate over and even argue to the nth degree. I can see why some avoid the news, though I am not one of them. It’s exhausting. 

    It was so refreshing being in that Hall where not a trace of that contentious spirit was to be found. It is not even that everyone agrees—they just know enough how to yield and not to squabble. Given the state of Covid in our community today, I personally think the strong mask recommendation is a bit dumb. But the majority apparently does not feel that way. I’ve been asked to wear one, so I do. It’s not that big of a deal.

    Of course, given the size of the crowd I did begin to think maybe its not such a bad idea after all. I have not been in such close proximity to large groups of people in two years.

    I also wasn’t sure how easy it would be to avoid handshakes. I like not having been sick in two years and I had resolved not to do it. But some in-your-face people are very insistent and the alternative elbow bump just seems too stupid to initiate. But it fact, a forearm glance proved pretty easy to do. Some shook hands with others. Some didn’t. It wasn’t any big deal.

    Alas, not all is peachy. I did see something to complain about. The speaker played a two-three minute video, and afterwards everyone clapped!

    I’m not playing this game anymore. I know how it starts . Someone well-respected thinks it is fine to “show appreciation.” He claps and others follow suit. People usually follow suit. I know this from the rare occasions that the music was not cued up and the attending servant can’t find it. If I knew the tune, I’d just belt it out. You’re only out there a split second or two before others follow suit. (It’s an unsettling split second, though—what if they don’t?)

    In the past I’ve given two or three half-hearted claps. No more. It’s silly. The video doesn’t know you’re clapping for it. We don’t clap every time some gives a demonstration on the platform. The Watchtower reader doesn’t earn an applause. It is enough to applaud the speaker, for that is customary and is the way things are done everywhere. 

    I don’t squabble over such things but neither do I have to follow suit. It is sort of like when brothers approach stage by disappearing behind that quarter wall and then appearing again. That drives me nuts. Just walk up on the platform. Do it right, brothers!

    Ah well. This is our version of problems. A bit less serious than those that hamstring the greater world, I think.

     

    ***The bookstore

  • Women Must Keep Silent in the Congregation?—How are You Going to Put Lipstick on THAT One?

    Women were lightly valued in the ancient Greco-Roman and yes—even the Jewish world. So God goes out of his way to highly value them.

    The testimony of a woman was considered near-worthless back then. So God arranges that the two most important newsflashes in history be given to women.

    The news that Jesus is the promised Messiah? First given to a woman:

    I know that Messiah is coming, who is called Christ. Whenever that one comes, he will declare all things to us openly.”  Jesus said to her: “I am he, the one speaking to you.” (John 4: 25-26) Even the disciples had to jump through hoops for that one. 

    Jesus raised from the dead? That bit of intelligence also first given to women:

    Why are you looking for the living one among the dead?” the angel asked the women. “He is not here, but has been raised up. Recall how he spoke to you while he was yet in Galilee, saying that the Son of man must be handed over to sinful men and be executed on the stake and on the third day rise.” Then they remembered his words, and they returned from the tomb and reported all these things to the Eleven and to all the rest. They were Mary Magdalene, Joanna, and Mary the mother of James. Also, the rest of the women with them were telling these things to the apostles. However, these sayings seemed like nonsense to them, and they would not believe the women.(Luke 24:5-11)

    They didn’t believe them! Because the testimony of a woman was worthless? The angel doesn’t even bother to correct the men. They’d figure it out eventually, the clods.

    And don’t get me going about Jael in the Old Testament, who had the privilege of pounding a tent pin through Sisera’s head! Sometimes guys need that. (Judges 4:25)

    So who do you think is assigned the talk explaining the apostle Paul’s words at 1 Corinthians 14:34? Me, that’s who! It’s not the easiest assignment in the world. Just listen to what Paul wrote:

    Let the women keep silent in the congregations, for it is not permitted for them to speak. Rather, let them be in subjection, as the Law also says.  If they want to learn something, let them ask their husbands at home, for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the congregation.

    I mean, how are you going to put lipstick on that one? How are you going to account for how they speak all the time in today’s Kingdom Hall meetings? The guy doesn’t even try to be politically correct—that’s Paul’s problem! From this verse stem the modern complaints that he didn’t like women and that he was misogynistic.

    Well, for a guy who doesn’t like women, he sure applauded enough of them. There is Phoebe, who has proved to be a defender of many, including me.” (Rom 16:1-2) There is Euodia and Syntyche, who “have striven side by side with me for the good news” (Phil 4:2-3) And when Lydia “just made us come,” she didn’t interject, “Not you Paul—you’re a misogynist.” (Acts 16:15)

    Women weren’t the only ones told to keep silent in that 1 Corinthians chapter. Men were, too, so that it appears to be a matter of special circumstances. Of gifts of the spirit that were destined to fade away but hadn’t yet in those days of Christianity’s infancy, congregation members who would speak in tongues when no one was around to interpret were to keep silent—what good is a tongue if nobody is around to understand it? (vs 28)

    If someone was exercising the gift of prophesy and another started doing the same, one or the other was to keep silent. That way “all things take place for building up,” (vs 26) appropriate since “God is a God not of disorder but of peace.” (vs 33)

    Always you have to figure in context for any item of scripture. It appears that the women who were to keep silent in 1 Corinthians 14 were also those of special circumstances. Maybe they were speaking just any old time out of order. Maybe they were challenging congregation teachers—male as a matter of spiritual headship. Maybe they were angling to be teachers themselves. It is not a verse that precludes commenting in the orderly Q & A structure of how meetings are carried on today, the same as men are to do.

    So I ran all these points past the congregation in my talk. Afterwards, no women gave me dirty looks. At least, no more than normal.

  • At the Wilkes-Barre Regional Convention

    We took supper at a Red Robin after the first day of the “Love Never Fails” Regional Convention in Wilkes-Barre. A child at the table just behind me, about 5 years of age (and not one of ours), began raising a horrible ruckus, screaming at the top of his lungs. His mother took him out, but when she returned, he started up anew. I turned around and asked the parents if everything was okay.

    I admit that I was looking for signs of endangerment. Maybe one “parent” or the other would look shifty. Maybe the child would act as though they were not his parents. This was not like when my own teenager dragged me through a trendy clothing boutique and I cried, “Help! Help! You are not my daughter!” Here I thought it might be serious. It is a sign of the times that I should think this, but I saw nothing alarming.

    There was a time not so long ago when most parents would respond in a certain way to such a tantrum, but that way is likely to land them in jail today. Jehovah’s Witnesses work with many refugee groups. They meet ones whose flight has turned their lives upside-down, and one of the most bewildering things the newcomers confront is that child-rearing customs that were absolutely routine and unremarkable back home are taboo in their new home. Do not misunderstand. I make no argument for their return. That said, it is by no means clear that today’s children are better adjusted for their disappearance.

    My turning around put the parents even more on notice that they were disrupting the entire restaurant. They could hardly have not known it before, but here was a fresh reminder. The father became heated, threatening no television for an entire week and such things. Upon leaving, I said to him: “Don’t worry about it. I’ve been there. They’re kids. It happens.”

    How did we come to be in Wilkes-Barre that year of 2019? For decades, those of my faith in the Upstate New York area have taken in their annual regional convention at Rochester’s Blue Cross Arena. But new management signaled new policies. “It’s not just money,” I was told, though it was that and quite a bit of it. It is also heightened security measures (another sign of the times) because no city wants to be the site of the next terrorist attack. They might have thought they had the Witnesses over a barrel because where else are they going to go at the last minute? But it isn’t easy to get the Witnesses over a barrel. With three weeks to go, when it became clear that prior verbal agreements would not be renewed, Jehovah’s Witnesses canceled that convention. They weren’t the only ones. Disney on Ice and Monster Truck Rally also canceled events that summer.

    Days later came the announcement that the show would go on, something that had never been in doubt, but it would be 200 miles away in Wilkes-Barre. We made lodging arrangements and joined the excitement that most of the brotherhood accepts as a matter of routine—it is the luck of the draw if the Convention happens to be in your back yard as it had been in ours for the longest time.

    The summer regional convention, in our back yard for the longest time

    We settled in for what would be, according to the event program, “three days of music-video presentations, prayers, songs, addresses, symposiums, and dramatic readings from the Bible.” That year Phoenix was the keynote city. From the Convention Center at Chase Field, packed to near 40,000-seat capacity, certain highlights comprising about ten percent of the total were streamed to “daughter” conventions, Wilkes-Barre being one of them.

    Witnesses are always on the alert for good press during these times. One writer for azcentral.com called Witnesses the foot soldiers of modern Christianity, the hallmark of wholesomeness, to whom he applied the same Matthew 7:70 scripture he also applied to his own LDS Church: “. . . by their fruits ye shall know them. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.” You can know a people by how they conduct themselves, is the idea.

    But another writer appeared to regard the attendants as wardens and thought attendees were all brainwashed. “Attendees listened rapturously,” she observed derisively, as though they should have been expected to nod off. In fact, some of them do nod off after lunch on long afternoons—it is one of those ‘the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak’ situations—and it was worse before the days of efficient air conditioning. Don’t attendees of concerts or rallies also listen rapturously? Why come if you will not?

    She felt “conspicuous in pants.” Well—whose fault is that? When I invite people to conventions, I say: “You are perfectly welcome to come just as you are. But if you don’t have one of these (I flip my tie), everyone will assume you are a visitor, and they may just come to preach to you.” It’s a heads-up that brings a smile. And the “wardens,” whom anyone else would call attendants, are indeed attentive. That terrorist concern of Rochester management is not lost upon them. After a kick-off meeting of attendant volunteers, the first bit of preparation was, “That’s the last time you will ever close your eyes during public prayer again.” Mostly though, they just expedite traffic flow and seating.

    Then there was one review I especially treasured because it neither gushed with praise nor signaled disapproval, but merely openness and curiosity. The fellow wrote, “Aside from the occasional door-to-door visits and that one time, which I still feel guilty about, when my brother drenched some evangelists with water balloons from our second-story bedroom window, I had never really met a Jehovah’s Witness.” (It took me two trips to the dry cleaners to get those water stains out of my suit.) He didn’t fall upon his face and do a Zechariah 8:23—'We will go with you people, for we have heard that God is with you people’—but considering his non-religious reporter background, I’ll take what he did write and thank him for it. You don’t have to quibble over every little thing.

    Stadium and hospitality personnel often cannot praise JWs enough, rarely encountering such orderly and pleasant people. A reporter in Miami wishes that the Marlins could fill their own stadium to capacity as have Jehovah’s Witnesses. A shock jock in Rochester a few years back waxed ecstatic over Witnesses when he found that they categorically reject violence. “These are my people!” he gushed on air. So much was he carried away with the Witnesses brotherhood—brother this and brother that—that he even mentioned their persecution at the hands of Brother Hitler before correcting himself. Another stadium is said to accept as payment-in-full the thorough annual scouring that the Witnesses give their facility.

    The public address of that Love Never Fails Convention explored a truth as self-evident as the truths Thomas Jefferson wrote about in the Declaration of Independence. In this case, it is that all instances of injustice occur and are cultivated due to a lack of love. That being so, and obvious, the question becomes: “Just who will teach love?” Will it be the university? That is not its job. It focuses on training the intellect, with the apparent assumption that moral qualities such as love will take care of themselves. As even the sloppiest purview of world headlines reveals, they do not. So who will teach it? Will it be agencies that are guided in training from the university that does not teach it? Is the quality so innate that it does not need to be taught? Again, a review of news headlines reveals the fallacy of such a notion. So who?

    Training that takes its cue from humankind’s Creator will play that role. “God is love,” states 1 John 4:8. Publicizing that truth is a “treasure,” slightly dampened but also made more real because it is a treasure carried in “earthen vessels”—that is, the flawed humans that are us, just as Paul states in 2 Corinthians 4:7.

    Later in the program, there was streamed the Cherokee man who grew up embittered because the white man had stolen the lands of his people. He was embittered anew when he was required to fight their war in Vietnam. When his wife began studying with two Witness women, he was sullen and unwelcoming—the last thing he wanted was the religion of the white man. When she reached the point of wanting to be baptized, he declared that he would not come. When asked who would watch his baby during the baptism, he figured that maybe he should come on that account. There, he observed the atmosphere for four days and his already softened attitude toward the Witnesses softened further.

    I took a great many notes with the intent to write them up into a post or two that never materialized. Alas, they were crowded out by too many other things to do. However, when specifically asked, “What did you learn that was new at the 2019 Love Never Fails Regional Convention?”—trust me on this—he did not want anything boiler-plate, so I gave him what was not boiler-plate:

    What I learned at the 2019 ‘Love Never Fails’ Regional Convention was that Brother Herd, who may not even know what political correctness is, will never reprove me for fat-shaming. He was the Governing Body keynote speaker streamed in from Phoenix. Establishing the point that it is the heart that matters, Brother Herd posed the quandary of marrying the woman—an excellent catch—with a heart of pure gold, even though she “clocks in at 200 pounds.” Is this fellow a diplomat or what?

    Everybody loves Brother Herd—maybe even more so than Brother Lett, whom some secretly fear may be too over the top in mannerisms. Herd has to be the humblest man on earth. How can he not be? Born to a father, a mule-driver, in his old age, one of 8 or 9 children, he said at the convention that for the longest time he thought that “a chicken only had a neck and a back because that’s all he ever got.”

    Outsiders will never ever ever get it about how such a man can become one of the Governing Body, but it harkens back to something I once posted about how that body is Plato’s dream come true: a monarchy type of governing in which the members are selected by merit, not by family line. The prerequisite modest, non-materialistic, not power hungry—such persons do exist, but the values of this world are such that they can never rise to the top. In the Witness organization, however, they can and do rise to the top—and part of their very qualifications is that they do not regard themselves as rising to the top, but only displaying a willingness to serve.

    At any rate, I got a lot of mileage out of Herd when some opposer posted footage of him shaking hands with well-wishers at the airport and tried to spin it that the rank and file make him an object of worship and that he eats it all up. Anyone who knows the slightest thing about the man knows that he practically scowls at the attention, but what can he do? There they are. They love him. He loves them, so he shakes everyone’s hand. “Imagine: Who would be so nasty and petty to begrudge an old man acknowledging the well-wishing of friends?” I tweeted. It was one of my most liked tweets of all time.

    He is really not even a good speaker, Sam Herd isn’t, but he is such a captivating storyteller that it doesn’t matter. His stories are so down-to-earth, so human, so involved in the day-to-day of life—very much like Jesus’ illustrations—so connected with all that is real about life, that he doesn’t have to spin erudite talks; his stories are such that everyone grasps the moral that he nowhere explicitly states. He appears in Tom Irregardless and Me as the title for chapter 2 and chapter 18. How often does that happen? He had given a talk so humble, yet so profound, that I used it to bookend the entire work.

    “One thing is clear about jw.org,” a local brother said. “They don’t use paid actors.” No, they don’t. It’s a little like Anthony Morris introducing himself another year at the Atlanta convention, also streamed to different locations. “Dad, what’s a redneck?” his boys had asked him long ago on a trip down south. “You’ll know them when you see them,” he had replied. But he must have thought he had gone too far, for in a later address he spoke of the “gentle folk-wisdom of the South.” Rise, for these guys too are human.

    You will never find people as unvarnished and real as are members of the Governing Body. Do not highlight people’s strengths. Highlight their weaknesses, though not in a fault-finding way, because in those weaknesses can be found God’s strength. If brilliant people carry out brilliant things—well, it is easy to see why. But if decidedly non-brilliant people carry out those things, it is not so easy to see why and the credit goes to God. Three times the apostle Paul pleaded with God to remove a weakness. ‘Nothing doing, God replied. I look better when you are a clod,’ the gist of 2 Corinthians 12:7-10.

    The Wilkes-Barre convention site is plainly visible from Interstate 81, the spine running from New York to Tennessee. Just look to your right and there it is. Jehovah’s Witnesses have good relations with management and had already strung 4 or 5 conventions there back-to-back. Just throw in another two to care for the displaced New Yorkers.

    It is also private property which means the dozen or so protestors eager to debate with someone are thwarted. It’s almost a tradition I miss, a ridiculous little pageant that plays out each year. Seldom do our people even look their way, often entering a human corridor so as to be unmolested, a circumstance the protestors interpret as brainwashing. There’s a yo-yo in a devil’s suit who shows up each year, pretending to be waving his disciples into the auditorium. Sheesh! Say what you will about Jehovah’s Witnesses—perhaps you’re not crazy about their visits, but they will never show up at your door dressed in a devil suit.

    Even the cops have become fed up, threatening arrest when they try to physically obstruct entrance. “Why don’t you just pop them one?” one of them asked a Rochester attendant, so said the concluding speaker. One year one of them brought a small child who soon had to go to the bathroom. Her mom said she’d just have to hold it. You know how children squirm when they have to go to the bathroom. Presently an attendant said they both could enter and use one of ours. The mother forbade it! She relented only after a police officer said a refusal might constitute child abuse. Thereupon, she left her protest sign with a friend—no, we didn’t offer to guard it for her, there are limits—and ventured into the fearsome building.

    But as stated, none of that happened on Wilkes-Barre private property. I parked in the lot, strode into the facility, and nobody at all had anything to say about it save for some friends who were glad to see me.

    (From the book: Go Where Tom Goes)